NORWEGIAN HITLER JUGEND RE-EDUCATED BY BLOND MILITANT
Welcome to the Department of Remembering, Norway Division.
Funny how these same weeping Fjordish Quislings couldn't see why the savages who butchered the sleeping Fogel children in Israel would be called "terrorists":
For Dagbladet, Fogel family slaughter is apparent “terrorism”
March 13, 2011 By McGonagall.
It must be really tough for Dagbladet to cover stories of cold blooded mass-murders carried out by knife wielding terrorists. So hard in fact that they appear unable to come up with an independent line of thinking, but copy wholesale from other news outlets, including offending inverted commas and suggestions that it is only Israelis who would call this a terror attack:
I Israelske medier blir drapsmennene omtalt som «terrorister» og opinionen beskylder palestinere for å stå bak.
Israeli media call the murderers “terrorists”, and public opinion accuse Palestinians to be behind the attack.
Good to know where Dagbladet stands on terrorism. I wonder how they would have reacted to a slaughter like this in Norway. Yellow journalism springs to mind….
No need to wonder any longer--just continue to blame the people resisting the jihad.
Yeah, I'm all broke up about the little intramural tragedy at their little camp, full of Aryan youth planning to help more Jooooooos die. You sow the wind, you reap the whirlwind.
Karma is a bitch, beeeyotches.
PS: Another bit of remembering--Nowegian Deputy Foreign Minister Johansen is first Western diplomat to recognize genocidal Joooooo-hating Hamas regime, 2007.
9 comments:
A little bit of searching on the internet reveals violent racist agenda of Pamela Geller.
She is also a genocide denier:
http://srebrenica-genocide.blogspot.com/2011/07/forensic-update-on-srebrenica-6598.html
Go flog your Red-jihadi krapp elsewhere, Dado.
For real "Daddyo" Pam Geller is the leading intellectual light of the racist/CJ/CD movement here in America and in Israel.
To Robert4: You really need to experience reality.
Something is seriously wrong with the US if this is called journalism. This is one of the worst pieces of hate-journalism I have seen in a long time. And if anuone wonders, I am Norwegian, and i Know moreobout your country tha you ever will about mine. That is unless you make an effort inlooking for real information. It is available.
Is this some kind of “Comedy Central” site? Where someone is trying to make a parody of right wing paranoia? Because this actually make the members of “tea party” look like well educated and well spoken intellectuals. And I have to admit: In all the tragedy we have experienced in Norway, its good to read something that makes you ROFL again. (A little explanation for the ones who sympathies with this site: ROFL stand for Rolling On the Floor Laughing)
And if this is for real… Then things really get bizarre. Because I’m a real Norwegian Viking who stands 2 meters tall and weight 120 kg. I even have a MENSA membership with an IQ about 170, black belt with some white stripes in taekwon-do and a civil engineer degree. And since we in Norway have conscription, I spent a half year in snowstorm and tent. (Love the smell of M2 Browning in the crisp -30 Celsius winter air).
So I’m a right wing poster boy that every right wing American with low self esteem and the “blame all failures on someone else” syndrome wants to be. And when I find the “opinions” on this site completely hilarious….. Then there’s something seriously wrong with your logic. Because you dream about a society that’s “blendakvitt”. (White as a bleaching brand we use in Norway). And when the prime specimens of that society look at you and laugh in your face of your ideas…. Dude, were talking way way beyond Epic Fail! And that’s extremely funny. Thank you Sir! This was just the good laugh I needed to get rid of the gloom after the massacre.
MensaThorDuuuuude, suck on this from Caroline Glick:
"Another aspect of the same anti-liberal behavior is the tendency by many to pick and choose which sorts of terrorism are acceptable and which are unacceptable, in accordance with the ideological justifications the terrorists give for their actions. The most recent notable example of this behavior is an interview that Norwegian Ambassador Svein Sevje gave to Ma’ariv on Tuesday.
Ma’ariv asked Sevje whether in the wake of Breivik’s terrorist attack Norwegians would be more sympathetic to the victimization of innocent Israelis by Palestinian terrorists.
Sevje said no, and explained, “We Norwegians view the occupation as the reason for terror against Israel. Many Norwegians still see the occupation as the reason for attacks against Israel. Whoever thinks this way, will not change his mind as a result of the attack in Oslo.”
So in the mind of the illiberal Norwegians, terrorism is justified if the ideology behind it is considered justified. For them it is unacceptable for Breivik to murder Norwegian children, because his ideology is wrong. But it is acceptable for Palestinians to murder Israeli children, because their ideology is right."
Beyond epic fail? Agreed. Extremly funny? Also agree. But representative for right wing? Yes. Because they all suffer from some kind of selective amnesia. Or perhaps they are not capable of understanding complex situations. As an exampel lets look at the way Sevje is quoted. Does it mention any context? No. Its completly black and white. Sevje is the bad guy that approves of attacks on Israel. Case closed. And lets forget the minor issues like that no foreign policy or anything else in Norway will change because of the terror attack. Why? Because thats what the terrorist wanted. He wanted a change. So they do the oposite. And that also includes Israel. But something like a countries official foreign policy is (to borrow a expression) way, way beyond the mental abillities to the right wing. They prefer to keep it simple and always let one person in a edited interview express the opinion of 5 millions individuals.
PS. Sorry about my english. Its my 4 language, so I write it only once or perhaps twice a year.
PPS. My nick is Yasirlova, even if its posted as Anonymous.
YL, your impressive educational background appears to have failed you: the whole concept of an ambassador is that he/she, indeed, represents his WHOLE COUNTRY. Officially. Legally. C'est tout.
Post a Comment