ONE-BOY ILLEGAL ALIEN CRIME WAVE BUTCHERS HOMEOWNER WHILE LAW ENFORCEMENT SNORES

BLOODTHIRSTY LITTLE F@CKING HOODLUM

WHO SHOULD HAVE BEEN DEPORTED WHEN HE WAS 13

Well-meaning free-marketers have a dangerous blind-spot when it comes to illegal immigration. Stories like this happen every single day in these United States, and while the media tries to downplay them, they are horribly corrosive to faith in our political authorities and sworn law-enforcement officials:

LAKELAND | Through nine arrests, no one questioned whether 14-year-old Noel Cruz-Diego was in the U.S. legally until he was charged with burglary, robbery and stabbing a Lakeland man 43 times last month.

Juvenile arrest reports obtained by The Ledger this week detail charges against him during 2 1/2 years and show that law enforcement knew for at least two years the teen was born in Mexico.

But an immigration detainer wasn't placed on the teenager until recently by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, when the agency was notified of Cruz-Diego's questionable status by the Polk County Sheriff's Office, according to DHS officials.

Although a minor, Cruz-Diego faces adult charges in the most recent case, in which he is accused of breaking into Daniel Granton's home Nov. 18 and stabbing him.

Let's just run the numbers in this ghastly story:

14 tender years of age.

9 arrests...

...in 30 months.

2 burglaries in 1 hour, the 2d of which resulted in...

43 stab wounds.

"Trailing blood, [the victim, Daniel Granton] crossed the street to Jeanette Garro’s house and knocked on the door for help. But Garro and her husband were asleep.

Garro said Granton left pools of blood on her front door and sidewalk, then collapsed underneath her carport on his way to the back door."

No, no, NOOO, this is not what Emma Lazarus had in mind. It's long past time libertarian-oriented stopped averting their eyes to it, and started contributing to a remedy to this eminently remediable problem. Even if we didn't apply a "zero-tolerance" policy for illegal aliens, why not a "two-strikes and you're out" policy?

It would have saved Daniel Granton a few quarts of blood.

THE NO-LONGER-RELIABLE WALL STREET JOURNAL (II)

WE'RE DROWNING IN TAQQIYAH, YET THE JOURNAL GIVES US MORE!

Wow, so soon after making the point about their news-section creeps, and now the usually stalwart op-ed page pulls this sh!t...Giving space to the oh-so-predictable taqqiyish cooings of this MPAC clown, Marayati...Robert Spencer expertly dissects them here.

If only Rupert Murdoch was still running this paper...

THE NO-LONGER-RELIABLE WALL STREET JOURNAL (I.)

Islam in grisly, cannibalistic action...And not a kaffir in sight.

I've been reading the Wall Street Journal for many years, and their editorial page is usually brilliant. But a few years ago I started noticing sentences...paragraphs...even whole articles in the news sections that could just as easily have been published by, you should excuse the expression, the New York Times. Strangely, a lot of them seem to involve a perspective on the world that is, if not actively pro-jihadi, certainly internalizes a lot of the pathological "grievances" and sick mythologies of the "Muslim world."

Take this story from today's WSJ frontpage. A nasty jihadi bomb went off in a graduation ceremony in Mogadishu, Somalia, where a number of graduating medical students (a rare commodity in that thoroughly Islamicized hell-hole) were murdered, along with government ministers. The story recounts a little of the history of Somalia, including US involvement there:

A blundered U.S. invasion in 1993 left 18 Americans and as many as 500 Somali civilians dead. The image of the bodies of American soldiers being dragged through the streets of Mogadishu -- later revisited in the movie "Black Hawk Down" -- became a cautionary tale in U.S. foreign policy. After that, the country descended into chaos.

Uhhhh, that's one way to look at it. Did I walk through a parallel universe where the The Nation calls itself the Wall Street Journal? Huuhhhh?

Does Journal owner Rupert Murdoch even read his own news pages anymore?

TIME FOR ISRAEL TO RECLAIM THE SINAI...

Or at least make it into an deadly, uninhabitable no-man's land.

Here is the latest casus belli from Egypt, which has made it a national mission for nearly 30 years to negate and nullify a solemn treaty which gained them 22,000 square miles of territory, Israel-developed oil-assets, and critical strategic grounds. Not to mention Mount Sinai, a locale of considerable significance to a certain group of people.

Often forgotten is a key provision of the Egyptian-Israeli Peace Agreement ("Camp David Accords") that encourages, how shall we say..."neighborliness" between the parties. To be specific, here is Annex III, Article V (according to the text posted at the Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs website):

Article V
Cooperation for Development and Good Neighborly Relations

	The Parties recognize a mutuality of interest in good neighborly relations and agree to consider means to promote such relations.
	The Parties will cooperate in promoting peace, stability and development in their region. Each agrees to consider proposals the other may wish to make to this end.
	The Parties shall seek to foster mutual understanding and tolerance and will, accordingly, abstain from hostile propaganda against each other.

How, then, does this despiccable and revolting video, broadcast on Egyptian television, constitute anything but a gross and inflammatory violation of the Agreement?

Of course this is not the only such violation by the Mizraihim, but it may be the most over-the-top. It's like they're trying to see how far they can kick Da Joooooooooooooos before they will let out a yelp of complaint.

We all know that spinelessness breeds contempt. If only the Israeli Cabinet understood this.

[BTW, props AGAIN to the awesome watchers of MEMRI, who really should have won the last, ohhh, 9 or 10 Nobel Peace Prizes. He who watches over Israel neither sleeps nor slumbers, and it appears MEMRI doesn't, either.]

THE WHOLE FILTHY "GLOBAL WARMING" FRAUD IS DEFINITIVELY EXPOSED

55 MILLION YEARS BEFORE HUMANS,

TROPICAL PLANTS BLOOMED

HERE AT THE ARCTIC

Twenty-eight months ago a determined climatologist named Steve McIntyre unearthed a huge, and hugely embarassing "error" by global warming guru Jim Hansen. Hansen had to go back and adjust his data, that suddenly pointed to a whole lot LESS global warming.

We all assumed at the time it was an "error." But now we have this leviathan fraud story coming from the Climate Research Unit in the UK...It is obvious that the global warming hacks have been cooking their books, models, and data since at least 1996, while scandalously suppressing honest scientists who disagreed with them. Oh, and also conspiring to destroy the data their projections were based on [actually NOT based on].

So how sure are we that James Hansen's 2007 "error" was just an "error?" And not a...FRAUD.

I said it here back nearly 3 years ago, and I'll say it again: Global warming isn't a hoax...It is a FRAUD.

IS IDENTIFICATION IMPORTANT?

Consider these photos of two different snakes, which share a common territory and habitat. They look similar, but are 2 species-is it important to identify which is which?

Well, one of them is utterly harmless, even beneficial as a predator of rodents. The other one is very dangerous, with an exceedingly deadly venom.

Is it important to identify which is which?

If we are going to kill any snake we come upon, identification is not important. But if we hope to live and let live, we had better be able to identify them accurately.

In the wake of the Fort Hood jihadi massacre. our military and security authorities would do well to at least TRY to identify hostile or unreliable individuals amongst their personnel. This is obviously made more difficult considering the position of our elected Traitor-in-Chief, but these people have human lives in their hands, and need to think about protecting loyal Americans from jihadi "colleagues." And damn the careerist consequences.

A good place to start is just one little question: How many uauthorized e-mails is acceptable for a US Army major to exchange with an al-Qaeda-affiliated imam in Yemen?

Jewish "Benyadict Arnolds," Then and Now...

Soros, Always Well-Dressed...

Direct from our “You Can’t Make This Sh!t up Dept.” (or is it from our “History Repeats Itself Dept.”?):

“Like every underground, however, we had a traitor. [Simon] Tsorros was never a member of the Irgun. For a time he worked for the fund from which the Irgun received financial aid. This brought him in touch with a number of people active in the Irgun and a number of others whom he believed to be active. It is hard to say when exactly he established contact with the special police, and became their agent. Tsorros was a gambler, and liked to dress well. He was short of money and, it seems, he was also a coward…[First] he denounced the radio transmitter at the Raziel home…Several weeks later he handed to Catling, the Head of the Jewish Department of the British C.I.D., a list of names, descriptions, and addresses.
…Meanwhile we considered what to do with Tsorros. My comrades demanded his execution. By the laws of the underground their demand was justified…Nevertheless I opposed the execution of Tsorros. I feared the possibility of error. I demanded full proof. I could not believe that a Jew could sink so low. I was mistaken. In the course of time I learnt the truth and admitted my mistake.

Tsorros informed on me personally. He came to our house.

Time has passed. I see before me all the boys, the heroic, the saintly, the pure. And I know that if a man rises above himself there is no limit to his ascent. And on the other hand I see Tsorros. He stands by my son’s crib.
The child laughs at both of us. Tsorros smiles at father and son. All the time he is thinking his thoughts. And again I know, if a man falls there is no limit to his descent.”
--Menachem Begin, "The Revolt," pp. 101-103